<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266010</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the respondent/assessee to amend their Bill of Entries to change the method of payment of countervailing duty, despite the Revenue&#039;s objections. The Court emphasized that the substance of the request was crucial, not the terminology used, and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in allowing the amendment under Section 149 of the Customs Act. The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting that practical implications should prevail over technicalities in statutory interpretation, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266010</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the respondent/assessee to amend their Bill of Entries to change the method of payment of countervailing duty, despite the Revenue&#039;s objections. The Court emphasized that the substance of the request was crucial, not the terminology used, and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in allowing the amendment under Section 149 of the Customs Act. The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting that practical implications should prevail over technicalities in statutory interpretation, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>