<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266009</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the challenge to the Settlement Commission&#039;s order dated 11th November, 2014, allowing the Petition and directing the Revenue to provide necessary documents to the Petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of the Petitioner having access to relevant records for a fair hearing, setting aside the impugned order and imposing conditions for compliance within a specified timeframe to revive the proceedings before the Commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266009</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the challenge to the Settlement Commission&#039;s order dated 11th November, 2014, allowing the Petition and directing the Revenue to provide necessary documents to the Petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of the Petitioner having access to relevant records for a fair hearing, setting aside the impugned order and imposing conditions for compliance within a specified timeframe to revive the proceedings before the Commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>