<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1279 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266004</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition, directing the return of the seized silver ornaments to the petitioner within a specified timeline. The court held that the respondent authorities lacked the authority to retain the seized ornaments as assessments did not result in any additions related to the seized property under section 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1279 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266004</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition, directing the return of the seized silver ornaments to the petitioner within a specified timeline. The court held that the respondent authorities lacked the authority to retain the seized ornaments as assessments did not result in any additions related to the seized property under section 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>