<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 1 - COMMISSIONER OF C.E. (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752</link>
    <description>The presiding authority set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the Appellants. The appeals were allowed, and it was held that the Service Tax paid on transportation of finished goods from the factory to the customer&#039;s premises could be claimed as Cenvat Credit by the Appellants, as per the provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 1 - COMMISSIONER OF C.E. (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752</link>
      <description>The presiding authority set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the Appellants. The appeals were allowed, and it was held that the Service Tax paid on transportation of finished goods from the factory to the customer&#039;s premises could be claimed as Cenvat Credit by the Appellants, as per the provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>