https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265979 The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) in allowing Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 12,40,024 to the respondent. The tribunal found that the items in question were correctly classified as capital goods, as they were used for the fabrication of an induction furnace. Revenue did not contest this classification during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of their appeal and the disposal of the cross objection filed by the respondent in the same judgment. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265979 The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) in allowing Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 12,40,024 to the respondent. The tribunal found that the items in question were correctly classified as capital goods, as they were used for the fabrication of an induction furnace. Revenue did not contest this classification during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of their appeal and the disposal of the cross objection filed by the respondent in the same judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265979