https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265976 The appellate tribunal set aside the order imposing redemption fine and penalty on the appellant for excess stock allegedly meant for clandestine removal. The lack of concrete evidence supporting the charge of clandestine removal led the tribunal to find the demand unsustainable, emphasizing the necessity for substantial evidence in such cases. The appellant's consistent claim regarding their daily production figures and the absence of contradictory evidence further supported the tribunal's decision to allow the appeal and provide consequential relief, if applicable. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265976 The appellate tribunal set aside the order imposing redemption fine and penalty on the appellant for excess stock allegedly meant for clandestine removal. The lack of concrete evidence supporting the charge of clandestine removal led the tribunal to find the demand unsustainable, emphasizing the necessity for substantial evidence in such cases. The appellant's consistent claim regarding their daily production figures and the absence of contradictory evidence further supported the tribunal's decision to allow the appeal and provide consequential relief, if applicable. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265976