<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1249 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals regarding the interpretation of exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, applicability of extended period for penalties, and imposition of penalties for contraventions of Central Excise Rules by the Appellants. The decision was influenced by differing interpretations of key expressions in the notification, following a precedent set in a similar case. The application for early appeal hearing was dismissed as infructuous, concluding the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1249 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals regarding the interpretation of exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, applicability of extended period for penalties, and imposition of penalties for contraventions of Central Excise Rules by the Appellants. The decision was influenced by differing interpretations of key expressions in the notification, following a precedent set in a similar case. The application for early appeal hearing was dismissed as infructuous, concluding the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>