<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1236 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that once depreciation claimed in income tax returns is reversed and certified, the appellant is entitled to CENVAT credit on capital goods. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and case law precedents to support this decision, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1236 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that once depreciation claimed in income tax returns is reversed and certified, the appellant is entitled to CENVAT credit on capital goods. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and case law precedents to support this decision, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>