<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1234 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, upholding the setting aside of the adjudication order. The case revolved around the reversal of input credit under Notification No. 30/2004-CE. Relying on judicial precedents, including a decision by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal determined that the reversal of credit amounted to non-availment of credit under the exemption notification. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming that the reversal of credit disqualified the Revenue from availing the exemption benefits, and thus, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the Respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1234 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, upholding the setting aside of the adjudication order. The case revolved around the reversal of input credit under Notification No. 30/2004-CE. Relying on judicial precedents, including a decision by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal determined that the reversal of credit amounted to non-availment of credit under the exemption notification. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming that the reversal of credit disqualified the Revenue from availing the exemption benefits, and thus, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the Respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>