<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 30 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=742</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the benefit of Modvat credit for inputs despite duty being voluntarily paid on fully exempt goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) is bound by higher tribunal decisions, not by CBEC Circulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the CCE (A) order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 30 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=742</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the benefit of Modvat credit for inputs despite duty being voluntarily paid on fully exempt goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) is bound by higher tribunal decisions, not by CBEC Circulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the CCE (A) order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>