<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1228 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the stay order granted in the case would continue until the appeal is finally disposed of, without requiring additional applications for extension of stay. This decision was based on the principle established in a previous judgment, clarifying that once a stay order is granted, it does not lapse and the appeal must be resolved within three years. Therefore, the applications for extension of stay were disposed of in accordance with this ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1228 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the stay order granted in the case would continue until the appeal is finally disposed of, without requiring additional applications for extension of stay. This decision was based on the principle established in a previous judgment, clarifying that once a stay order is granted, it does not lapse and the appeal must be resolved within three years. Therefore, the applications for extension of stay were disposed of in accordance with this ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>