https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265952 The appellate authority upheld the duty demand due to unaccounted removal of goods, dismissing the appeal of M/s. A.P. Steels and reinstating the penalty imposed by the Revenue. The tribunal emphasized the importance of not granting leniency in penalties to deter evasion practices. Additionally, the involvement of Shri D. Purushothaman as a Manager in facilitating the evasion scheme was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of his appeal regarding his role in the evasion activities. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:53:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265952 The appellate authority upheld the duty demand due to unaccounted removal of goods, dismissing the appeal of M/s. A.P. Steels and reinstating the penalty imposed by the Revenue. The tribunal emphasized the importance of not granting leniency in penalties to deter evasion practices. Additionally, the involvement of Shri D. Purushothaman as a Manager in facilitating the evasion scheme was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of his appeal regarding his role in the evasion activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265952