https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265943 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and upholding the duty demand with interest. The penalty was revoked, and the Adjudicating authority was directed to re-calculate the duty demand after verifying the CENVAT Credit eligibility. The decision was based on the interpretation that duty becomes payable for every removal of excisable goods, regardless of a sale, clarifying the duty liability in the case. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265943 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and upholding the duty demand with interest. The penalty was revoked, and the Adjudicating authority was directed to re-calculate the duty demand after verifying the CENVAT Credit eligibility. The decision was based on the interpretation that duty becomes payable for every removal of excisable goods, regardless of a sale, clarifying the duty liability in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265943