<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1182 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265907</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to cenvat credit for inputs destroyed in a fire at the job-worker&#039;s factory. The tribunal clarified that Rule 3(5C) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply to destroyed inputs and that the appellant is not liable to reverse the credit. The decision overturned the denial of cenvat credit by the Revenue, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:51:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1182 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265907</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to cenvat credit for inputs destroyed in a fire at the job-worker&#039;s factory. The tribunal clarified that Rule 3(5C) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply to destroyed inputs and that the appellant is not liable to reverse the credit. The decision overturned the denial of cenvat credit by the Revenue, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>