https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265901 The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalties on the respondent was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the confiscation and redemption fine while providing the option to pay a reduced penalty under specific statutory provisions. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal precedents and ensuring the availability of such options when not initially offered by the Adjudicating Authority. en-us Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:51:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265901 The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalties on the respondent was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the confiscation and redemption fine while providing the option to pay a reduced penalty under specific statutory provisions. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal precedents and ensuring the availability of such options when not initially offered by the Adjudicating Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265901