<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265898</link>
    <description>A workshop functioning solely for mine-related purposes and under the same management was held to fall within the scope of the exemption under Notification No. 63/95-CE. The expression in the notification was construed broadly in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation to advance the object of encouraging the mining industry. On that construction, the appellant was entitled to the exemption and consequential benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 06:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265898</link>
      <description>A workshop functioning solely for mine-related purposes and under the same management was held to fall within the scope of the exemption under Notification No. 63/95-CE. The expression in the notification was construed broadly in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation to advance the object of encouraging the mining industry. On that construction, the appellant was entitled to the exemption and consequential benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>