https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265897 Full waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant had not established a prima facie case for complete dispensation. The Tribunal applied a balancing approach and granted waiver only to the extent of the balance, requiring a substantial deposit during the pendency of the appeal. The concessional duty position under Notification No. 6/2006-CE was noted as relevant to computation, but not sufficient at that stage to justify total waiver of pre-deposit. On that basis, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 4,00,000 within eight weeks, after which the remaining duty, interest and penalty would be stayed. en-us Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:51:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265897 Full waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant had not established a prima facie case for complete dispensation. The Tribunal applied a balancing approach and granted waiver only to the extent of the balance, requiring a substantial deposit during the pendency of the appeal. The concessional duty position under Notification No. 6/2006-CE was noted as relevant to computation, but not sufficient at that stage to justify total waiver of pre-deposit. On that basis, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 4,00,000 within eight weeks, after which the remaining duty, interest and penalty would be stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265897