<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the Adjudication order against the Respondents in a revenue appeal case. The dispute centered on the misuse of SSI exemption and brand name use by the Respondents in manufacturing Power Driven Water Pumps. The Tribunal found in favor of the Respondents, emphasizing the certification by the Trade Mark authority establishing the Respondent as the brand name proprietor from a specific date. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision and rejecting the duty demand for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the Adjudication order against the Respondents in a revenue appeal case. The dispute centered on the misuse of SSI exemption and brand name use by the Respondents in manufacturing Power Driven Water Pumps. The Tribunal found in favor of the Respondents, emphasizing the certification by the Trade Mark authority establishing the Respondent as the brand name proprietor from a specific date. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision and rejecting the duty demand for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>