https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265894 The Tribunal revised the original order due to errors in the amounts of clandestine removals mentioned. The discrepancies highlighted by the petitioner were confirmed by the Revenue representative. After examining the case records, the errors were found to be apparent, leading to the substitution of a new table with corrected amounts for various assesses. The ROM applications filed by the appellants were allowed, rectifying the errors in the original order dated 24.09.2014. en-us Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:50:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265894 The Tribunal revised the original order due to errors in the amounts of clandestine removals mentioned. The discrepancies highlighted by the petitioner were confirmed by the Revenue representative. After examining the case records, the errors were found to be apparent, leading to the substitution of a new table with corrected amounts for various assesses. The ROM applications filed by the appellants were allowed, rectifying the errors in the original order dated 24.09.2014. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265894