<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1160 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 10,332 for &#039;Rent a Cab&#039; service due to the recovered amount from employees. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of CCR, 2004 was waived. The appeal was partly allowed based on the findings of the lower authorities and the original adjudicating authority, maintaining the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1160 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 10,332 for &#039;Rent a Cab&#039; service due to the recovered amount from employees. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of CCR, 2004 was waived. The appeal was partly allowed based on the findings of the lower authorities and the original adjudicating authority, maintaining the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>