<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1155 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on voluntarily paid differential duty, despite not being determined under Section 11A(2). It ruled that interest under Section 11AB is applicable for delayed duty payment to compensate for revenue loss, following legal precedents. The appellant&#039;s argument that interest should not be charged on voluntarily discharged duty was dismissed, affirming the Revenue&#039;s position that interest is inevitable in cases of delayed duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1155 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on voluntarily paid differential duty, despite not being determined under Section 11A(2). It ruled that interest under Section 11AB is applicable for delayed duty payment to compensate for revenue loss, following legal precedents. The appellant&#039;s argument that interest should not be charged on voluntarily discharged duty was dismissed, affirming the Revenue&#039;s position that interest is inevitable in cases of delayed duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>