<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants&#039; activities of conducting chemical analysis and providing test results for pesticides did not fall under the category of &#039;Scientific and Technical Consultancy&#039; for service tax purposes. The Tribunal referenced a previous case involving Central Power Research Institution to support this decision, highlighting that mere testing and result provision without additional service elements may not be subject to Service Tax under the specified category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants&#039; activities of conducting chemical analysis and providing test results for pesticides did not fall under the category of &#039;Scientific and Technical Consultancy&#039; for service tax purposes. The Tribunal referenced a previous case involving Central Power Research Institution to support this decision, highlighting that mere testing and result provision without additional service elements may not be subject to Service Tax under the specified category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>