<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1151 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265876</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellants for clearing goods without paying duty under &quot;PA&quot; series of invoices during 2006-2007 and 2008-2009. Despite the submission of a Panchnama as evidence by the Appellant, the Tribunal rejected the appeal against the penalty under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, citing the evidence presented as irrelevant to the duty demand for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1151 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265876</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellants for clearing goods without paying duty under &quot;PA&quot; series of invoices during 2006-2007 and 2008-2009. Despite the submission of a Panchnama as evidence by the Appellant, the Tribunal rejected the appeal against the penalty under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, citing the evidence presented as irrelevant to the duty demand for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>