<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265865</link>
    <description>Duty liability on goods manufactured through a job worker must be examined in the hands of the actual manufacturer, and the downstream manufacturer cannot be denied exemption merely because duty on the ingots was separately in issue. The text states that Notification No. 7/97-CE remained available for bars and rods made from ingots received from a job worker where the inputs had undergone duty, and non-payment of duty by the job worker did not by itself fasten liability on the finished goods manufacturer. It also notes a limited remand for fresh determination of the job worker&#039;s assessable value and duty liability, including consideration of Notifications No. 214/86-CE and No. 7/97-CE after hearing and a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265865</link>
      <description>Duty liability on goods manufactured through a job worker must be examined in the hands of the actual manufacturer, and the downstream manufacturer cannot be denied exemption merely because duty on the ingots was separately in issue. The text states that Notification No. 7/97-CE remained available for bars and rods made from ingots received from a job worker where the inputs had undergone duty, and non-payment of duty by the job worker did not by itself fasten liability on the finished goods manufacturer. It also notes a limited remand for fresh determination of the job worker&#039;s assessable value and duty liability, including consideration of Notifications No. 214/86-CE and No. 7/97-CE after hearing and a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>