https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265857 Credit attributable to inputs used in exempted clearances was reversed, and the adjudicating authority accepted that reversal in de novo proceedings and dropped the duty demand on clinker. The disputed period was also covered by earlier notices in which the demand had already been dropped. On those facts, the basis for the Revenue's challenge did not survive, and the appeal was rejected on merits. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265857 Credit attributable to inputs used in exempted clearances was reversed, and the adjudicating authority accepted that reversal in de novo proceedings and dropped the duty demand on clinker. The disputed period was also covered by earlier notices in which the demand had already been dropped. On those facts, the basis for the Revenue's challenge did not survive, and the appeal was rejected on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265857