https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265855 The Tribunal dismissed the restoration applications, emphasizing that the appellant could not be deprived of justice without proper explanation of material facts, especially when a similar appeal from Revenue was pending before the Tribunal. The confusion caused by a previous judgment was resolved, emphasizing that the Committee's decision should not affect the present appeals. Despite the Supreme Court judgment rendering the Committee's decision unnecessary, the appellant was still not allowed to dispute further with Revenue. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265855 The Tribunal dismissed the restoration applications, emphasizing that the appellant could not be deprived of justice without proper explanation of material facts, especially when a similar appeal from Revenue was pending before the Tribunal. The confusion caused by a previous judgment was resolved, emphasizing that the Committee's decision should not affect the present appeals. Despite the Supreme Court judgment rendering the Committee's decision unnecessary, the appellant was still not allowed to dispute further with Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265855