<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1116 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265841</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on M.S. channels, angles, beams, plates and H.R. coils used for plant and machinery depended on whether the materials were for support structures or for replacement of damaged machinery parts. Because the record did not bifurcate eligible and ineligible use, the credit question required fresh examination and was remanded for de novo adjudication. On penalty, the dispute was treated as a bona fide controversy in light of conflicting views on credit eligibility, and no deliberate intention to evade duty was established, so penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1116 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265841</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on M.S. channels, angles, beams, plates and H.R. coils used for plant and machinery depended on whether the materials were for support structures or for replacement of damaged machinery parts. Because the record did not bifurcate eligible and ineligible use, the credit question required fresh examination and was remanded for de novo adjudication. On penalty, the dispute was treated as a bona fide controversy in light of conflicting views on credit eligibility, and no deliberate intention to evade duty was established, so penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>