<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174721</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no justification on the facts to admit the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it. The order indicates that the Court declined to proceed with the appeal after considering the case-specific factual record, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174721</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no justification on the facts to admit the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it. The order indicates that the Court declined to proceed with the appeal after considering the case-specific factual record, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>