https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174716 The article examines whether remission of duty under Rule 21 can be claimed without reversing Cenvat or Modvat credit, including in the face of the CBEC circular dated 01.10.2004, and whether repeated fire incidents caused by the absence of fire safety measures can still qualify as unavoidable events for remission purposes. It focuses on the legal interaction between credit reversal requirements, administrative circular guidance, and the statutory standard for remission where loss arises from fire. The Gujarat High Court admitted the matter and issued notice on the substantial questions of law. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:11:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174716 The article examines whether remission of duty under Rule 21 can be claimed without reversing Cenvat or Modvat credit, including in the face of the CBEC circular dated 01.10.2004, and whether repeated fire incidents caused by the absence of fire safety measures can still qualify as unavoidable events for remission purposes. It focuses on the legal interaction between credit reversal requirements, administrative circular guidance, and the statutory standard for remission where loss arises from fire. The Gujarat High Court admitted the matter and issued notice on the substantial questions of law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174716