<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265837</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of appeals by the garment processing unit regarding service tax demand on hire charges. The Court found that the service of notice via speed post did not comply with statutory norms before a specified date, rendering the notice invalid for calculating the limitation period. As the appeals were filed within the limitation period from the actual receipt of the order, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper service and adherence to statutory norms in legal proceedings. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the appeals on their merits and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265837</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of appeals by the garment processing unit regarding service tax demand on hire charges. The Court found that the service of notice via speed post did not comply with statutory norms before a specified date, rendering the notice invalid for calculating the limitation period. As the appeals were filed within the limitation period from the actual receipt of the order, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper service and adherence to statutory norms in legal proceedings. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the appeals on their merits and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>