<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1100 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265825</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Commissioner of Customs&#039; extension of the initial six-month period for issuing a show-cause notice under the Customs Act. The court determined that the notice and extension were both issued within the prescribed timeframe, as per the relevant legal provisions and precedents. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the extension was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1100 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265825</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Commissioner of Customs&#039; extension of the initial six-month period for issuing a show-cause notice under the Customs Act. The court determined that the notice and extension were both issued within the prescribed timeframe, as per the relevant legal provisions and precedents. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the extension was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>