<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1082 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the reduction of sale consideration and disallowing the expenditure towards tenant settlements due to lack of evidence. However, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument limiting the exemption under Section 54 to one residential house, allowing the benefit for both flats purchased by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1082 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the reduction of sale consideration and disallowing the expenditure towards tenant settlements due to lack of evidence. However, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument limiting the exemption under Section 54 to one residential house, allowing the benefit for both flats purchased by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>