<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 2,50,000 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the assessee&#039;s explanations false and not bona fide. The penalty was confirmed due to the inclusion of impugned turnover as export turnover without proper approval, despite the lack of substantiation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 2,50,000 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the assessee&#039;s explanations false and not bona fide. The penalty was confirmed due to the inclusion of impugned turnover as export turnover without proper approval, despite the lack of substantiation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>