<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case for verification of related party transactions ratio of disputed comparables. The decision stressed the need for concrete evidence in applying legal principles on selecting comparables in transfer pricing cases, emphasizing that companies with related party transactions exceeding 15% should be excluded. The order was issued on 9th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case for verification of related party transactions ratio of disputed comparables. The decision stressed the need for concrete evidence in applying legal principles on selecting comparables in transfer pricing cases, emphasizing that companies with related party transactions exceeding 15% should be excluded. The order was issued on 9th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>