<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 699 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174695</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as the extended limitation under proviso to Sec. 11A of the Central Excise Act was not available due to no suppression of relevant facts, making the notice and demand time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:23:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 699 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174695</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as the extended limitation under proviso to Sec. 11A of the Central Excise Act was not available due to no suppression of relevant facts, making the notice and demand time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>