<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265784</link>
    <description>Disallowance of advertisement expenditure on the basis that the bills were accommodation entries was held unsustainable where the assessee produced confirmation and supporting material showing actual advertising services. The addition rested mainly on the statement of the alleged entry provider and an inference that rate cards, TRP ratings and other corroboration were insufficient, but that material did not by itself establish that the impugned bills were non-genuine. Following coordinate Bench decisions on identical facts, it was held that transactions found non-genuine in other concerns of the same person could not, without more, justify treating these bills as sham. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265784</link>
      <description>Disallowance of advertisement expenditure on the basis that the bills were accommodation entries was held unsustainable where the assessee produced confirmation and supporting material showing actual advertising services. The addition rested mainly on the statement of the alleged entry provider and an inference that rate cards, TRP ratings and other corroboration were insufficient, but that material did not by itself establish that the impugned bills were non-genuine. Following coordinate Bench decisions on identical facts, it was held that transactions found non-genuine in other concerns of the same person could not, without more, justify treating these bills as sham. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>