<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 46 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny Modvat credit and impose a penalty on a manufacturer for a procedural lapse in filling RG-23A Part-I register. Citing consistent precedent since 1998, the Tribunal held that clerical errors in Part-I did not justify credit denial or penalties. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant and emphasizing the importance of previous rulings in ensuring fairness and consistency in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 46 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny Modvat credit and impose a penalty on a manufacturer for a procedural lapse in filling RG-23A Part-I register. Citing consistent precedent since 1998, the Tribunal held that clerical errors in Part-I did not justify credit denial or penalties. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant and emphasizing the importance of previous rulings in ensuring fairness and consistency in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>