<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1034 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow a reduced penalty of 25% to the respondents, considering the circumstances and events leading to the restoration of the demand for cenvat credit. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in tax matters, rejecting Revenue&#039;s appeal for restoration of an equal penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1034 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow a reduced penalty of 25% to the respondents, considering the circumstances and events leading to the restoration of the demand for cenvat credit. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in tax matters, rejecting Revenue&#039;s appeal for restoration of an equal penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>