<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1033 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265758</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on textile inputs in process was examined on a factual dispute over whether the assessee had included processing charges, colours and chemicals in the credit computation or had limited it to grey fabrics under process. Credit on processing charges was not reopened because that issue had already been decided against the assessee in an earlier Tribunal ruling. The remaining demand lacked a clear factual foundation in the record, so the basis for alleging excess credit was found inadequate. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication after considering the assessee&#039;s plea.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:24:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1033 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265758</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on textile inputs in process was examined on a factual dispute over whether the assessee had included processing charges, colours and chemicals in the credit computation or had limited it to grey fabrics under process. Credit on processing charges was not reopened because that issue had already been decided against the assessee in an earlier Tribunal ruling. The remaining demand lacked a clear factual foundation in the record, so the basis for alleging excess credit was found inadequate. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication after considering the assessee&#039;s plea.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>