<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1032 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning the adjustment of excess payment against shortfalls, following Rule 7 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and High Court precedent. The impugned orders were set aside, granting relief to the appellant and emphasizing the binding nature of High Court decisions over Tribunal rulings in excise duty cases. The issue of the premature refund claim was not extensively addressed, as the resolution of the primary issue led to the appeals being allowed and consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1032 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning the adjustment of excess payment against shortfalls, following Rule 7 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and High Court precedent. The impugned orders were set aside, granting relief to the appellant and emphasizing the binding nature of High Court decisions over Tribunal rulings in excise duty cases. The issue of the premature refund claim was not extensively addressed, as the resolution of the primary issue led to the appeals being allowed and consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>