https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265755 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision setting aside a demand due to limitation in a case involving excisable goods valuation. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the Respondent to evade duty payment, emphasizing the public declaration of valuation methods and regular communication with the Department regarding price changes. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting extended limitation periods were distinguished, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:24:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265755 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision setting aside a demand due to limitation in a case involving excisable goods valuation. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the Respondent to evade duty payment, emphasizing the public declaration of valuation methods and regular communication with the Department regarding price changes. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting extended limitation periods were distinguished, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265755