<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1028 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of CENVAT credit on inputs used in manufacturing capital goods within the factory. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was disposed of, entitling the assessee to consequential relief as per law. The judgment reinforced the interpretation of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, regarding the eligibility of inputs and capital goods, even when the fabricated goods are immovable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1028 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of CENVAT credit on inputs used in manufacturing capital goods within the factory. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was disposed of, entitling the assessee to consequential relief as per law. The judgment reinforced the interpretation of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, regarding the eligibility of inputs and capital goods, even when the fabricated goods are immovable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>