https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265749 The appeal was rejected due to the appellant's failure to comply with the pre-deposit directive of Rs. 1 lakh within six weeks. The appellant, claiming to be a commission agent, sought a review of the order but failed to establish grounds for reconsideration. The appellant's request for de novo consideration of the stay application was also dismissed for lack of valid grounds. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to procedural requirements, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:23:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265749 The appeal was rejected due to the appellant's failure to comply with the pre-deposit directive of Rs. 1 lakh within six weeks. The appellant, claiming to be a commission agent, sought a review of the order but failed to establish grounds for reconsideration. The appellant's request for de novo consideration of the stay application was also dismissed for lack of valid grounds. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to procedural requirements, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265749