<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1016 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265741</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 under Section 260A. The main issue was whether the galvanizing process qualifies for deduction u/s. 80IB. As the question was previously settled in favor of the respondent in a prior decision, the Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeals, citing the binding precedent. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1016 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265741</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 under Section 260A. The main issue was whether the galvanizing process qualifies for deduction u/s. 80IB. As the question was previously settled in favor of the respondent in a prior decision, the Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeals, citing the binding precedent. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>