<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265733</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses. The court emphasized the guidelines set by the Delhi High Court, requiring a detailed comparison of AMP functions and exclusion of selling expenses from AMP expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265733</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses. The court emphasized the guidelines set by the Delhi High Court, requiring a detailed comparison of AMP functions and exclusion of selling expenses from AMP expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>