https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265726 The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions on all issues raised in the appeal. The additions of Rs. 75,00,000 and Rs. 15,00,000 were deleted as unexplained investments and gross profit lacked substantiation. Recalculation of deduction under section 80HHC was directed, and the additional evidence submission under Rule 46A was accepted. The ITAT found the orders well-reasoned and supported by evidence, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:21:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265726 The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions on all issues raised in the appeal. The additions of Rs. 75,00,000 and Rs. 15,00,000 were deleted as unexplained investments and gross profit lacked substantiation. Recalculation of deduction under section 80HHC was directed, and the additional evidence submission under Rule 46A was accepted. The ITAT found the orders well-reasoned and supported by evidence, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265726