<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1000 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265725</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the matter back to the AO for verification following the assessee&#039;s claims and legal references. The AO was instructed to verify sub-contract and interest payments, following the Special Bench decision on TDS for professional fees. Ultimately, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, restoring the matter to the AO for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1000 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265725</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the matter back to the AO for verification following the assessee&#039;s claims and legal references. The AO was instructed to verify sub-contract and interest payments, following the Special Bench decision on TDS for professional fees. Ultimately, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, restoring the matter to the AO for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>