<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 985 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restoring the prior period expenditure issue for re-examination by the AO. It denied Section 80IA deduction for miscellaneous income, interest income, and insurance claim, upheld the treatment of software expenditure as revenue, and directed the inclusion of sales tax subsidy in profits for Section 80HHC computation. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction of discount received for deduction computation under Section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 985 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restoring the prior period expenditure issue for re-examination by the AO. It denied Section 80IA deduction for miscellaneous income, interest income, and insurance claim, upheld the treatment of software expenditure as revenue, and directed the inclusion of sales tax subsidy in profits for Section 80HHC computation. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction of discount received for deduction computation under Section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>