https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174680 Compulsory retirement imposed in disciplinary proceedings was upheld because the order, read as a whole, rested on proved charges recorded by the enquiry tribunal and not on mere suspicion. The tribunal had regularly conducted the enquiry, found three of five charges proved, and the Government expressly acted on those findings. Where the Government concurs with the tribunal's adverse conclusions, it is not required to record separate reasons for accepting them; such reasons are needed only if it departs from the tribunal's view. The writ challenge therefore failed, and the disciplinary order stood sustained. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:35:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174680 Compulsory retirement imposed in disciplinary proceedings was upheld because the order, read as a whole, rested on proved charges recorded by the enquiry tribunal and not on mere suspicion. The tribunal had regularly conducted the enquiry, found three of five charges proved, and the Government expressly acted on those findings. Where the Government concurs with the tribunal's adverse conclusions, it is not required to record separate reasons for accepting them; such reasons are needed only if it departs from the tribunal's view. The writ challenge therefore failed, and the disciplinary order stood sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174680