<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 976 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit, citing lack of effective personal hearing and failure to extend applicable benefits. It dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and instructed the appellant to deposit an additional amount and file a detailed reply within four weeks. The adjudicating authority was directed to consider compliance before further adjudication. Non-compliance would allow the authority to proceed, while compliance required adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was disposed of by remand, with the appellant required to fulfill specified conditions for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 976 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit, citing lack of effective personal hearing and failure to extend applicable benefits. It dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and instructed the appellant to deposit an additional amount and file a detailed reply within four weeks. The adjudicating authority was directed to consider compliance before further adjudication. Non-compliance would allow the authority to proceed, while compliance required adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was disposed of by remand, with the appellant required to fulfill specified conditions for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>